Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
January 22nd, 2013, 10:36 AM
|
|
Replies: 30
+1 for the tasks problem. It really needs to be archived, not deleted.
Please have this so done tasks are simple marked as done.
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 11th, 2012, 01:26 PM
|
|
Replies: 24
just about to hit 0500-9000..!
It would be so good if the 0500 part could be utilised.
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 24th, 2012, 02:41 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
So, how do I arrange a trial of the SQL?
For the relative costs, I need to evaluate this in a real live environment before committing to the purchase.
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 12:07 PM
|
|
Replies: 61
"The good news are that @danoli is wrong :-)"
Yeesh, Seems this is where the good news ends!
Just noticed this is per connection and not per license.... we are gonna need to cough up $729...! (this...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 11:58 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
Yes, I would like a trial...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 11:56 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
Wow, well why didn't you announce it clearly? This thread has been open over 3 years!
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 11:07 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
@nattivillin
I suspect not, although I would be happy if this is the case.
I suspect the answer is, SQL uses less bandwidth for data queries, queries are handled server side, but EXE and DLL's...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 10:33 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
Does it run the executables/dll's across the wire or on the local machine?
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 09:58 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
cheers @nattvillin, exactly what I thought, so the answer is that CommitCRM does not work without either SQL or VMWare (or some other virtulization)
Running CommitCRM across a 'slow link' still...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 09:06 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
So you are saying to operate CommitCRM across WAN links or slower LAN links we need to use SQL via a VPN link or to use VMWare sessions?
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 07:38 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
"Well, despite @danoli's sarcasm it is already possible for quite a long time now. It can be implemented when using SQL. "
then next post....... "Using SQL is optional."
Which is it? Do we need...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 06:16 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
Touched a nerve...
All joking aside, it still requires the expensive SQL upgrade and still runs the executables via the server.
Updates for common customer requests do take a while so while I 'was'...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
May 17th, 2012, 12:17 AM
|
|
Replies: 61
you are joking right? It's only been just over 3 years since this promise. It normally takes them double this assuming everyone continues pestering them for the fix :) report back in a few more...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 29th, 2011, 02:44 PM
|
|
Replies: 6
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 28th, 2011, 05:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
I do not recall you responding to this question in the other thread hence the reason I started a new thread.
I agree, the lock session does just that, but unfortunately if the locked session has...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 23rd, 2011, 12:29 PM
|
|
Replies: 6
Is there any way to avoid this?
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 22nd, 2011, 02:46 PM
|
|
Replies: 13
Commit, what is with all this 'adding a vote' why not just fix or add things? I really am at a loss with CommitCRM lately, I am sick of having to vote to have things done.
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 22nd, 2011, 02:40 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
QUOTE BY HAYDEN
"Then save your stuff... jez, how hard is it?"
Let me guess, you have never accidentally lost work and wished the program had auto save or disallowed you from making simple mistake...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 22nd, 2011, 02:25 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
'Imply' is the key word here. If you click File - Log on as a different user, it takes you to the same login box as you would initially login, giving the assumption you are now logged out, when in...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 19th, 2011, 05:21 PM
|
|
Replies: 7
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 19th, 2011, 04:21 AM
|
|
Replies: 7
I do not allow any details to be given to a customer for the same reason as well. What we use back end is not for customer knowledge.
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 19th, 2011, 02:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
Try this,
Go to ANY account, edit it, (I edited the customer address field)
do NOT save.
Now, lock your session. (It is a realistic scenario, probably not common but highly possible)
Try to edit...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 19th, 2011, 02:42 AM
|
|
Replies: 21
Another flaw...
Try this, go to ANY account, edit it, (I edited the customer address field), do NOT save, now, lock you session. It is a eralistc scenario, probably not common but highly...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 19th, 2011, 02:33 AM
|
|
Replies: 21
lol, Hayden, do not worry, I have booked all of our engineers on a 2 day course on how to double check that when the system says 'logout', it actually does what it implies. It is an in-depth course,...
|
|
Forum: RangerMSP Software Discussion Forum (CCRM)
December 17th, 2011, 10:34 AM
|
|
Replies: 21
Hear Hear... Falling on deaf ears I am afraid. (unless you want to 'suggest' it as a fix and have other 'vote' if it should be implemented, ridiculous!) Such a simple fix!
What about a locked...
|
